Testimony 2020

2020 Testimony – 51

Members of the Judiciary Committee, It’s wrong for legislators to champion a red flag law as though they are the solution to the growing crisis of gun violence in America. Address the real problem fund the Firearm Trafficking Task Force, Support HB 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS and HB 5390 AN ACT

2020 Testimony – 51 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 67

Committee on Judiciary c/o LOB Room 2500 300 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106 OPPOSE HB 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT SUPPORT HB 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS SUPPORT HB 5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP Dear Committee, I am

2020 Testimony – 67 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 83

The Judiciary Committee, I am writing in regards to HB 5448, HB 5432, HB 5390. An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant. This bill is nothing more than a mask over a gun grabbing agenda. There are current laws written making offenses with firearms illegal, as well as domestic violence offenses. Please make

2020 Testimony – 83 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 36

Joint Committee on Judiciary 300 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106 RE: OPPOSTITION to HB 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT To: Honorable Members of the Joint Committee on Judiciary, HB 5448 is based on the Giffords and Bloomberg red flag system, it allows people, including ex-girlfriends or ex-boyfriends to file for

2020 Testimony – 36 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 52

Re: H.B. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT H.B. 5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP H.B. 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS Oppose H.B. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Support H.B. 5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE

2020 Testimony – 52 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 68

Joint Judiciary Committee 300 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106 OPPOSTITION to HB 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT SUPPORT HB 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS SUPPORT HB 5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP To: Members of the Joint Judiciary Committee,

2020 Testimony – 68 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 84

Oppose H.B. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Support H.B. 5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP Support H.B. 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS Members of the Judiciary Committee, One study looked at suicide in Connecticut. Connecticut’s estimated reduction in firearm

2020 Testimony – 84 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 37

To the members of the Judiciary Committee Re: H.B. No. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT. I am adamantly opposed to this expansion, and equally dramatic loss of rights proposed by HB 5448. An actual abuser can use this to disarm their intended victim, and then following that, their intended and

2020 Testimony – 37 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 53

Oppose HB5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Support HB5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS Honorable Members of the Judiciary Committee, It is well-known in family and domestic law that ex parte procedures with low standards of evidence are often abused by angry spouses in a divorce, jilted lovers, and

2020 Testimony – 53 Read More »

Scroll to Top
Malcare WordPress Security