Testimony

testimony before state legislature
use TAGs to differentiate years

2020 Testimony – 29

OPPOSE-Raised HB-5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant To Whom it May Concern, HB-5448 is to establish a risk protection order and to expand upon the list of persons who may be complainants for purposes of issuance of a risk warrant. Currently, anyone can call 9-1-1 and do this. HB-5448 is to […]

2020 Testimony – 29 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 45

Re: H.B. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT. Re: H.B. 5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP Re: H.B. 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS Sen Winfield, Rep Stafstrom, Members of the Committee, I’m writing today because I’m strongly opposed to H.B.

2020 Testimony – 45 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 61

Esteemed Judiciary Committee Members; This is another opportunity for the state to potentially deprive certain people of their civil liberties. Oppose Raised HB-5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT. Support bills like Raised HB-5390 and Raised HB-5432. Sincerely,  [INSERT NAME] [INSERT TOWN] 

2020 Testimony – 61 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 77

To Whom it May Concern, OPPOSE Bill #5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT. This is just another opportunity for the state to deprive people of their rights to self-protection. SUPPORT Bill #5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS. SUPPORT Bill #5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A

2020 Testimony – 77 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 30

I am Opposed to Bill #5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Sen Winfield, Rep Stafstrom, Members of the Judiciary Committee, If this committee is concerned with legal gun owners’ mental health, why pass a bill that will discourage gun owners from seeking mental health? The current law has is effective. Oppose

2020 Testimony – 30 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 46

OPPOSE- Raised HB-5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant Judiciary Committee, I’m opposed to any procedure that allows a judge to hear only one side of a case, this will produce a high error rate. Civil liberties will be striped based on one sided judgment. This wrong. Oppose Raised HB-5448. SUPPORT- Raised

2020 Testimony – 46 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 62

Oppose Bill #5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant Members of the Joint Judiciary Committee Keep the due process, allow for an investigation before rights are taken away. Any procedure that allows a judge to hear only one side of a case necessarily will produce a high error rate. Support Bill #5432

2020 Testimony – 62 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 78

Joint Committee on Judiciary 300 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106 OPPOSTITION to HB 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT SUPPORT for HB 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS SUPPORT HB 5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP To: Honorable Members of the

2020 Testimony – 78 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 31

Re: OPPOSTITION to H.B. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT.  To: The members of the Judiciary Committee, Any procedure that allows a judge to hear only one side of a case will only produce a high rate of abuse. This is constitutional rights you’re talking about.  Keep Connecticut’s requirement that a

2020 Testimony – 31 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 47

Oppose HB5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Support HB5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP Support HB5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS Honorable Members of the Judiciary Committee, In Connecticut, a confiscation petition may be filed only by two law enforcement officers

2020 Testimony – 47 Read More »

Scroll to Top
Malcare WordPress Security