Testimony 2020

I am Opposed to Bill #5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Sen Winfield, Rep Stafstrom, Members of the Judiciary Committee, If this committee is concerned with legal gun owners’ mental health, why pass a bill that will discourage gun owners from seeking mental health? The current law has is effective. Oppose […]

OPPOSE- Raised HB-5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant Judiciary Committee, I’m opposed to any procedure that allows a judge to hear only one side of a case, this will produce a high error rate. Civil liberties will be striped based on one sided judgment. This wrong. Oppose Raised HB-5448. SUPPORT- Raised

Oppose Bill #5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant Members of the Joint Judiciary Committee Keep the due process, allow for an investigation before rights are taken away. Any procedure that allows a judge to hear only one side of a case necessarily will produce a high error rate. Support Bill #5432

Joint Committee on Judiciary 300 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106 OPPOSTITION to HB 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT SUPPORT for HB 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS SUPPORT HB 5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP To: Honorable Members of the

Re: OPPOSTITION to H.B. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT.  To: The members of the Judiciary Committee, Any procedure that allows a judge to hear only one side of a case will only produce a high rate of abuse. This is constitutional rights you’re talking about.  Keep Connecticut’s requirement that a

Oppose HB5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Support HB5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP Support HB5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS Honorable Members of the Judiciary Committee, In Connecticut, a confiscation petition may be filed only by two law enforcement officers

Esteemed Judiciary Committee Members; Support- H.B. 5390 AAC the Duty to Retreat in a House of Religious Worship Support- H.B. 5432 AAC Nonlethal Electronic Defense Weapons OPPOSE- H.B. 5448 AAC a Risk Protection Order or Warrant H.B. 5448 AAC a Risk Protection Order or Warrant this bill would demand that anyone who has had a

To the members of the Judiciary Committee H.B. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT. H.B. 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS H.B.  5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP I am adamantly opposed to this expansion, and equally dramatic loss of rights

Dear Committee, I am a resident of Connecticut and wish to voice my opposition for Bill 5448. Your opposition for this bill is important to me. There are already laws on the books that can protect people instead of this bill changing the existing law into something which I see being too easy to abuse.

Joint Committee on Judiciary Legislative Office Building 300 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106 RE: OPPOSTITION to HB 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT To: Judiciary Committee, I’m opposed to H.B. 5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant because a study of the Indiana law allowing police to seize